Proprioceptive training: are you really improving proprioception?

During the last decade, proprioceptive training has been described as one of the most important aspects in a rehabilitation or training program. Training facilities often use the term “proprioceptive training” to describe balance exercises with the premise that it will prevent injuries to occur. Rehabilitation professionals also use “proprioceptive training” exercises as a mean to improve and recover the sensorimotor function.

Proprioception and balance are two different concepts. However, balance tests are often used in order to assess proprioceptive function. Even for testing the efficacy of a training program on proprioceptive function, researchers often use balance measures or tests. So, this leads to an important question: are we really improving proprioception, or are we just improving balance?

First, it’s important to understand the definitions of proprioception and balance.

1. What is proprioception?

Proprioception involves awareness of joint position (joint position sense), movement (kinesthesia), and force, heaviness, and effort (force sense) (Martin and Jessell, 1991; Riemann and Lephart, 2002).

Proprioception is the product of sensory information supplied by specialized nerve endings termed mechanoreceptors, i.e., transducers converting mechanical stimuli to action potentials for transmission to the CNS (Martin and Jessell, 1991; Yahia et al., 1992).

According to this, proprioception is an unconsciously perception, an afferent information from the proprioceptors.

Mechanoreceptors specifically contributing to proprioception are also termed  proprioceptors, and can be found in muscle, tendon, joint, fascia and skin. (see table 1)



Table 1. Mechanoreceptors of the human body

The muscle spindles, found in all skeletal muscles in parallel with the extrafusal muscle fibers (Peck et al., 1984; Kulkarni et al., 2001; Banks, 2006) are considered the most important source of proprioception (Gordon and Ghez, 1991; Proske and Gandevia, 2012). They are highly sensitive and their density varies widely throughout the body, reflecting different functional demands. The sub-occipital muscles of the neck have an exceptionally high density of muscle spindles, thought to reflect the cervical spine’s unique role in head and eye movement control (Liu et al., 2003). Importantly the sensitivity of the muscle spindles can be adjusted via innervation of the polar ends of the intrafusal muscle fibers by gamma motorneurons (Gordon and Ghez, 1991).

Joint proprioceptors have historically been considered “limit detectors”, stimulated at the extremes of joint range-of-motion (ROM) (Burgess and Clark, 1969). However it is now known that joint proprioceptors provide input throughout a joint’s entire ROM under both low and high load conditions stimulating strong discharges from the muscle spindle and are thus vital for joint stability (Sojka et al., 1989; Johansson et al., 1990; Needle et al., 2013).

This is why mobility is so important to perception. If mobility is reduced, afferent information from the proprioceptors is likely to be negatively affected, resulting in less awareness.

2. What about balance?

Balance is a mechanical term describing the state of an object when the resultant loads acting upon it are zero (Pollock et al., 2000). An object is in balance when its centre of gravity (COG) falls within its base of support (BOS), preventing falling.

Human balance, or postural control, is the capacity of maintaining stability by changing line of gravity (LOG) within BOS, or by changing BOS in order to prevent falling (Pollock et al., 2000). The main difference between objects and humans is that among humans, even in the case that LOG falls out their BOS, that doesn’t mean falling, because we can recover balance through stepping or swaying, for example. Additionally, we also need LOG falling out their BOS, in order to accelerate, changing direction, and other sort of dynamic tasks.

Also, we can further define human balance such as maintenance of a static posture, movement between different postures and reaction to an external stimulous. To achieve these goals, one needs voluntary but also reflexive control of movement. (Horak, 2006)

Therefore, human balance relates to the conscious and reflexive capacities to control their COG, LOG and BOS positions, relative to intrinsic and/or extrinsic disturbances.

3. What is proprioceptive training?

Proprioceptive training is often described as single leg drills using different implements, such as unstable surfaces of various types. Unstable surfaces was assumed to create a proprioceptively enriched environment that progressively challenges the proprioceptors and nervous system. But is this an absolute truth?

Analyzing the definition of proprioception stated in the beginning of this text, we can conclude that proprioceptive training refers to any type of intervention that promote proprioceptive feedback and afferent information to the CNS. So, even simple mobility drills are proprioceptive.

Additionally, it is assumed that by doing exercises which stimulate proprioceptors, proprioception will improve, and that this improvement leads to improved balance. However, there is no evidence that proprioception can be improved by training.

In order to improve proprioception, at least one of the following must be improved: acquisition of mechanical stimulus, its conversion to neural signal, followed by its transmission to the CNS. It is known that the velocity conversion of stimulus into neural signal and its transmission to the CNS is not variable, being its value fixed. (Lepart and Fu, 2000)

So, the only possible way left to improve proprioception is through improved proprioceptors sensivity, such as muscle spindles. However, it has only been seen in research an increase in muscle spindles fusimotor firing rate, which may be due to increased alpha-gamma coactivation during voluntary stiffening of a muscle. So, it does not necessarily mean that proprioception was improved, and more studies on this are required. (Granit, 1970)

4. Practical applications

Balance improvements involves not only neuromuscular or musculoskeletal factors, but is also dependent on motor learning and CNS function.

Closed-loop activities (where afferent information assumes an important role) and slow to moderately fast conscious and reactive movements, such as static single leg balance, require an important contribution of proprioceptive feedback. However, in order to get this feedback it takes time, around 100 miliseconds. This period of time exceeds the time available to avoid injuries during time-critical tasks such as running, where ground reaction force reaches to the injurious level in less than 50 miliseconds. So, proprioceptive feedback is not effective enough to avoid sports injuries. (Magill, 2010; Milia et al., 1998)

Instead, open-loop system (mainly efferent information from CNS to musculoskeletal system) assumes a very important role of preventing injuries to occur, being the CNS crucial to this antecipatory mechanism.

Putting this, acquisition and practice of motor skills under different contexts such as non-reactive and reactive circunstances, challenging decision-making, single or sequenced patterns, low and high intensities are extremely important in order to achieve motor learning, and subsequent injury prevention and performance enhancement.

5. Final thoughts

Until today, it has not been proved that proprioception can be improved by exercise. Despite that, proprioceptive information is only important during slow closed-loop activities, such as static single leg balance. However, being the vast majority of sports played with high speed, and injuries often occuring during high speed movements, proprioception is not effectively used under this circunstances. On the other hand, CNS has a very important role, so emphasis should be given to motor learning strategies in order to enhance performance and reduce the likelihood of injury.

(based and adapted from Kim, Van Ryssegem & Hong, 2011)

Luís Mesquita


  1. Banks RW., (2006). An allometric analysis of the number of muscle spindles in mammalian
    skeletal muscles.
     J Anat 2006;208(6):753e68.
  2. Burgess P and Clark F., (1969). Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol
  3. Gordon J. and Ghez C., (1991). Muscle receptors and spinal reflexes: the stretch reflex. in: E. Kandel, J. Schwartz, T. Jessell (Eds.) Principles of neural science. Prentice-Hall International, London; 1991:564–580.
  4. Granit R., (1970). The basis of motor control. Academic, New York, 1970.
  5. Horak F.B., (2006). Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 35(Suppl 2): ii7–ii11, 2006.
  6. Johansson H., Lorentzon R., Sjölander P. and Sojka, P., (1990). The anterior cruciate ligament: a sensor acting on the γ-muscle-spindle systems of muscles around the knee joint. Neuro Orthop. 1990;9:1–23.
  7. Kulkarni V., Chandy MJ. and Babu KS., (2001). Quantitative study of muscle spindles in sub-occipital muscles of human foetuses. Neurol India 2001;49:355-9
  8. Lephart S.M., and F.H. Fu., (2000). Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability. Human Kinetics. 2000.
  9. Liu J., Thornell L. and Pedrosa-Domellof F., (2003). Muscle sindles in the deep muscles of the human neck: a morphological and immunocytochemical study. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51:175–186.
  10. Magill R.A., (2010). Motor learning and control: concepts and application. (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
  11. Martin J and Jessell T., (1991). Modality coding in the somatic sensory system. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T, editors. Principles of neural science. London: Prentice-Hall International Inc.; 1991. p. 341e52.
  12. Milia M., M.J. Siskosky, Y-X. Wang, J.P. Boylan, E.M. Wojtys, and J.A. Ashton-Miller., (1998). The role of the ankle evertor muscles in preventing inversion during a one-footed landing on a hard surface: an experimental study in healthy young males. Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Vancouver, 1998.
  13. Needle A., Charles B.B.S., Farquhar W., Thomas S., Rose W. and Kaminski T., (2013). Muscle spindle traffic in functionally unstable ankles during ligamentous stress. J Athl Train. 2013;48:192–202.
  14. Peck D., Buxton D. and Nitz, A., (1984). A comparison of spindle concentrations in large and small muscles acting in parallel combinations. J Morph 1984; 180:243-52
  15. Pollock A.S., B.R. Durward, P.J. Rowe, and J.P. Paul., (2000). What is balance? Clin Rehabil. 14: 402– 406, 2000.
  16. Proske U. and Gandevia S.C., (2012). The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:1651–1697.
  17. Riemann B. and Lephart S., (2002). The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train 2002;37:71-9.
  18. Sojka P., Johansson H., Sjölander P., Lorentzon R. and Djupsjöbacka M., (1989). Fusimotor neurones can be reflexly influenced by activity in receptor afferents from the posterior cruciate ligament. Brain Res. 1989;483:177–183.
  19. Yahia I., Rhalmi S., Newman N. and Isler M., (1992). Sensory innervation of human thoracolumbar fascia. An immunohistochemical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63(2):195-7

One thought on “Proprioceptive training: are you really improving proprioception?

  1. Interesting discussion on some of the literature on human proprioception and balance, and training to improve resistance to injury. Yes proprioception, which is based on fixed numbers and specific types of position sensation receptors and nerve pathways likely is not improvable, if anything with aging deteriorates. However I would expect the motor response to proprioception both automatic and volitional to be improvable with repetition (training). As training can improve speed , power etc. which can act to improve position maintenance or voluntary or involuntary change in position, yes balance if trying to prevent change in position or facilitation of change in position, transitional imbalancing.
    Empirically most of us who do some physical training know that their balance and ability to imbalance has improved by training both by using various static positioning , strength and speed and endurance training.
    In the end , in practical terms regarding analysis of our training programming it doesn’t really matter to us that the scientific observation is that proprioception is not improvable, so much as that effects on how we function and how protected we are against injury, appear to be significantly improvable by our voluntary action of dedicated training.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s